I'm trying to broaden my horizons. I know quite a bit
about American comics, and have quite a few classics from that side of the Atlantic in
my collection. But my knowledge of Manga is not that deep, and though I grew up
with European comics, I mostly just know the gag strips and the boy’s adventure
comics like Asterix of Spirou. Which is of course disgraceful for an
internationalist and multiculturalist like myself. Hence why I googled for a
couple of "best off" lists, and picked up a few classics. Among them
The Incal.
So what did I think about it?
Uhm… I'll tell you after the jump!
Let’s start at the beginning. The Incal is the story of John Difool, a private eye from a science-fiction city who ends up in the possession of a... a... let's call it a magical thingy, the Incal. As the thingy begins to cause all sorts of havoc, from getting birds to talk to triggering divine enlightenment in people, the rich and powerful of the universe set their eyes on John. And so the story spreads from the city to the planet, from the planet to the universe, and eventually beyond reality itself, and from John running from assassins to a galaxy-wide political intrigue, to a quest for universal enlightenment.
Let’s start at the beginning. The Incal is the story of John Difool, a private eye from a science-fiction city who ends up in the possession of a... a... let's call it a magical thingy, the Incal. As the thingy begins to cause all sorts of havoc, from getting birds to talk to triggering divine enlightenment in people, the rich and powerful of the universe set their eyes on John. And so the story spreads from the city to the planet, from the planet to the universe, and eventually beyond reality itself, and from John running from assassins to a galaxy-wide political intrigue, to a quest for universal enlightenment.
But in a comic the story is but one part of it. There
is also the art. And good god, what art it is! An absolute classic by Moebius, one
of the greatest comic artists European comicry has ever produced.
(A small selection to showcase the sprawling sci-fi landscapes, facial
expressions, unique designs and action sequences. Being from Holland my copy of The Incal
is in Hollish, so please excuse the bizarro language and just enjoy the pretty
pictures)
I had seen Moebius’ stuff before on Blueberry and
Silver Surfer, but here he can really cut loose. Full on sprawling sci-fi
locations, trippy journeys into other dimensions and all the other bizarre
stuff Alejandro Jodorowski has thought up for him to draw. Whether he is asked
to draw robots, aliens, sexy ladies, conjoined foetus-emperors or just two
people sitting and talking to one another, Moebius is incapable of drawing
something that is not gorgeous. And it doesn't just look good, his designs are
also a perfect fit for the sprawling world galaxy we are presented with
here. Starting out in a dystopian city where the suicidal jump into an acid
lake by droves, and where the prostitutes are genetically engineered according
to your specifications while you wait, the story just keeps on expanding. First
the planet is further explored and we get an evil techno-pope and a society of
mutants, then we zoom out and the events start to involve the entire
intergalactic empire. The next part introduces a second intergalactic empire
full of bizarre aliens, and finally the story just goes beyond… beyond everything
really. The universe, reality... it gets really trippy in the end, let's put it
that way. And Moebius as fantastic designs for everything. Whether it is
dystopian squalor, high sci-fi opulence of LSD-style spirit journeys.
Finally, the panel-to-panel flow, the cinematography
of the comic, if you will, is also pretty good. There is a handful of wonky
panels, but overall it is good work, cutting between wide angle overviews and
tight close-up shots when necessary.
So it's quite clear my apprehension at the begin of
the review has nothing to do with the art. Let's turn to the story then. The
Incal grew out of Jodorowski's never realized plans for a movie version of
Frank Herbert's Dune series. Sometimes that shows. We never get a good
explanation of what a "Mentrek" is, but those familiar with Dune will
just read "Mentat" instead, and know exactly what is going on. But
the influences are never so blatant that it feels like a rip-off. Jodorowski
has taken all the stuff he found interesting in Dune and build upon that,
filling out the setting with much more than just riffs on Herbert. The
worldbuilding is very impressive, as is the way things just keep building and
building. But that's where my first problem with the story comes in… the setting
is very interesting, but it is also so huge that a lot of things get introduced,
but never elaborated upon. I’ve already mentioned the Mentreks. Apparently
there is this whole organization of living-computer advisors, but it gets only
mentioned in passing. Worse, two mayor characters are apparently sisters who
once fought for control of an underground society of humongous rats. That is
all the backstory we get, the rats are in one scene, and then it is never
mentioned again. Which is a bit frustrating. Just throwing sci-fi ideas out
there to flesh out the world I can get behind, but when it comes to the
backstory of main characters things really should have been elaborated on.
In a way you could see the above as a compliment: the setting is so good I want more! (And yes, I am tempted to pick of Metabarons or Megalex, other series in the same universe) But my main problem is with the characterization. While I'm not a big fan of pure dramas or romances, I absolutely adore good characterisation in my sci-fi or fantasy epics. A quiet moment between to characters can make you love them far more than any action sequence can, and a realistic conversation can ground a story, making to most out there fantasy world seem realistic. That is part of why I like Alan Moore and Josh Whedon so much. Unfortunately, those kinds of scenes are few and far between in The Incal. Most character development seems to come from epiphanies. For example: in one scene the main cast is brought together: a child and it's estranged mother, warring sisters, old enemies holding grudges. Prime material for some good dialogues and character development, you'd think. But what happens? They sit down, a glowing light talks to them, they meditate and all is forgiven. From that moment on they are a band of inseparable friends. Now, that scene might be forgiven. The work was clearly influenced a great deal by Jodorowski’s spiritual beliefs, and faith and religious epiphanies are a main focus of the book. But it’s not just the interactions with the Incal that go this way. Non-religious character development goes the same way. John Difool meets a lady, and he’s immediately smitten, even though she says nothing but her name. At first I thought this meant a mind control plot was imminent, or something similar. But no. Apparently that is just how things go in this story. But what is even stranger is what happens next. The characters have barely any scenes together. The only character interaction between them is one short scene that has her rejecting him. And then, a book later, they are genuinely in love. Completely out of the blue. All the character development apparently happened behind the scenes.
(No, you didn't miss anything, that's all of the character interaction between those. Clearly a love story for the ages.)
In the end,
for me The Incal is just to.... spiritual, I guess the word is. Apparently the idea for the Incal came to Jodorowsky in a vision. And that's my problem with the book. It's not about the
characters. Most of them are cyphers, and while main character John Difool does
have a clear personality, he's just there to blunder from scene to scene. It's
not even about the plot. The real point of the story is to showcase Jodorowsky's
beliefs, which are all about psycho-magic, Buddhist influences, "breaking
the boundaries between the conscious and unconscious", and more stuff that
is just really hard to follow. Now, I do have a philosophical streak in me. And
if you are so inclined you can have a lot of fun theorizing over the
implications of The Incla (Perhaps grab a few interviews with Jodorowsky assecondary literature first though) But that doesn't save The Incal
as a read.
The stuff I
said earlier, about good characters grounding a sci-fi or fantasy story? Well,
the same can be said of a philosophical treatise. If you want to convince
people of the Zen ideas that came to you in a vision, it would help
tremendously if you use rounded characters that confront the ideas in a
realistic manner. After all, these are not ideas the general public has a lot of
experience with. But instead we get ciphers, who are converted when a magic
thingy shines a special light on them. And as a result we, the readers, are
left just like John Difool, "the eternal witness", stumbling from
scene to scene, not really getting what is going on.
But at
least we get to see some damn pretty pictures while doing so.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten